The implications particularly for an NGO lke Amnesty, which has to rely on a strong connection to reality in order to establish the truth (or otherwise) of situations of prisoners of conscience, victims of political oppression etc, are concerning. One can't treat an organisation that not only denies straightforward biological facts, but actively promulgates discord by backing the nefarious position that to relate such facts is hate speech, as having any credibility whatever. Such a position means it's game over for Amnesty International. That's very sad, given its history.
The implications particularly for an NGO lke Amnesty, which has to rely on a strong connection to reality in order to establish the truth (or otherwise) of situations of prisoners of conscience, victims of political oppression etc, are concerning. One can't treat an organisation that not only denies straightforward biological facts, but actively promulgates discord by backing the nefarious position that to relate such facts is hate speech, as having any credibility whatever. Such a position means it's game over for Amnesty International. That's very sad, given its history.